Top 1% of Attorneys in CA
CA Lawyer of the Year
Top 10 Injury Attorneys in CA
Founder - CALIFORNIA'S ACCIDENT FORUM
Law Firm of the Year
Top 100 Trial Attorneys in CA
Professor of Personal Injury Law
California Premises Liability Lawyer
Premises liability encompasses a wide variety of issues related to injuries sustained on the property of another. These issues may include slip and falls, trip and falls, and other dangerous conditions causing injury.
To proceed with a premises liability claim, the plaintiff must, at a minimum, be able to prove the following:
- That the defendant controlled the property where the injury occurred;
- i.e., the defendant leased, owned or occupied the property (“[a] defendant need not own, possess and control property in order to be held liable; control alone is sufficient.” (Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1162)
- That the defendant negligently maintained or used the property;
- That the plaintiff was injured; and
- That the defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s injuries.
Premises Liability Lawyer
“The liability of landowners for injuries to people on their property has been governed by general negligence principles,” (Pineda v. Ennabe (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1407) but proving the defendant’s negligence is the most difficult aspect of any premises liability claim. While determining who controls the property and whether the plaintiff is injured are relatively easy ventures, establishing the defendant’s negligence is where things (may) get tricky.
A person who controls (i.e., owns, leases or occupies) the property in question owes a duty to use reasonable care in keeping the property in a reasonably safe condition. Understand, maintenance of the property alone does not establish control. (Alcaraz, supra, 14 Cal.4th at p. 1170) This duty requires the individual to use reasonable care in discovering any unsafe conditions and then to repair or replace the condition. If repairing or replacing the unsafe condition is not done, the individual must provide the property with adequate warnings of any condition that could reasonably be expected to harm others. An individual who fails to perform these duties will likely be found negligent.
If you have been injured in a slip and fall or trip and fall due to someone’s negligence contact the premises liability lawyers at The Steven Dhillon Law Firm at (818) 874-9485. Call today for a free initial consultation of your case.
Personal injury attorney Steven Dhillon personally answers all phone calls and e-mails. You’ll never have to go through a secretary or paralegal to have your call returned or questions answered. We provide superior results through dedicated and zealous representation.
Get In Touch
Recent blog posts on PREMISES LIABILITY:
There are many kinds of insurance policies under which you can protect yourself and your property following a car, motorcycle or trucking accident, regardless of who is at fault or responsible for damages stemming from the accident. In a previous blog...
In a previous post, we discussed important California laws related to the operation of a bicycle on streets and highways. These laws were designed to minimize the occurrence of bike-related accidents (see Riding a Bicycle on California Street?...
Personal injury accidents come in all shapes and sizes. Depending on the type of vehicle involved, some accidents can be more catastrophic than others. Big-rig (i.e., trucking) accidents are often the most severe because of their size (see...
In our previous blog post, we discussed how California law imposes strict liability on the owner of a wild animal that injures someone, regardless how much effort was in place to restrain the wild animal or prevent it from harming someone (see...
A previous blog post discussed how California law follows a theory of liability known as "strict liability" for the owner of a dog that bites someone (see Dog Bites and Dog-Related Injuries). But does strict liability apply to other...
In our previous blog post, If a Child is Injured and in Need of Help, Do You Have to Help?, we discovered that there is no affirmative duty to render assistance to an injured person in need of help following a car accident, motorcycle accident,...
While driving down a rural country road, you see a 7-year old kid yelling to you for help. He is bleeding badly and in need of assistance because he was just involved in a car accident. You are fully able to render aid to his personal injuries...
Continuing our series on causes of action under a negligence theory (see Injury Accident Cause of Action? Negligence) stemming from a car accident, trucking accident (i.e., "big rig" or "semi truck"), motorcycle crash or other personal injury...
Undeniably, children are treated differently under the law than adults. This is true both in the criminal courts, as well as the civil courts. In previous posts, we discussed the legal requirements one must satisfy in order to prevail on a...
The direct victim of a car accident, trucking accident (i.e., "big-rig" accident), motorcycle accident, premises liability accident (e.g., slip and fall or trip and fall) or other personal injury accident has a cause of action against the...
Join Our Newsletter
Stay up to date on recent news.